The completion rates for General Mathematics in the 2024 QCE cohort highlight a steady decline in student numbers as they progress through the course. Unit 1 had the highest enrolment, with 23,152 students completing the unit. This number dropped slightly in Unit 2, with 22,188 students completing the unit, indicating a minor attrition rate. However, a more noticeable decline occurred between Units 2 and 3, where 20,414 students completed the final two units. This suggests that while most students persisted through the course, some opted out before the summative assessments in Units 3 and 4, which contribute to their ATAR. The decline could be attributed to various factors, such as subject difficulty, changing academic interests, or adjustments in student pathways.
Understanding the QCE General Mathematics Exam: Format, Expectations, and Key Focus Areas
The QCE General Mathematics external assessment is a key component of the subject’s final grading, contributing 50% to a student’s overall result. This exam assesses students’ ability to apply mathematical concepts to real-world scenarios, requiring both procedural fluency and problem-solving skills. According to the General Mathematics syllabus, the exam consists of short-response questions covering topics from Units 3 and 4, including bivariate data analysis, time series analysis, growth and decay in sequences, Earth geometry, loans, investments, and networks. Students are expected to demonstrate their understanding through calculations, reasoning, and interpretation of mathematical models. While a scientific calculator is permitted, graphics calculators and other advanced technologies are not allowed, ensuring students rely on their mathematical reasoning rather than computational shortcuts.
💡 Ace your QCE General Mathematics exam with this comprehensive guide!
Insights from multiple choice questions in the 2024 General Mathematics exam
The easiest question in the 2024 QCE General Mathematics exam was Question 11, with 92.78% of students achieving a Band B result. This suggests that most students found the question accessible, likely due to its alignment with familiar content and standard procedures. Interestingly, Question 11 was also the hardest question, as it had the lowest percentage of students scoring in Band C (1.63%), indicating that while many students performed well, very few demonstrated mid-level competency.
This disparity suggests that students either fully understood the question or struggled significantly, with little middle ground. The analysis highlights the importance of practising a range of problem types to ensure consistency across all levels of difficulty.
Key Takeaways from the 2024 General Mathematics Examination Report
The 2024 QCE General Mathematics examination report offers valuable insights into student performance, highlighting key skills for success, common errors, and essential advice for future candidates. This analysis serves as a guide for students aiming to refine their mathematical skills and maximise their results in upcoming assessments.
Key Skills for General Mathematics Students
Top-performing students demonstrated strong problem-solving abilities, clear mathematical communication, and strategic use of technology. According to the examination report, effective responses were characterised by:
- Accurate use of mathematical reasoning – High-achieving students provided clear justifications for their answers, effectively explaining their working rather than relying solely on calculations.
- Fluency in key mathematical techniques – Those who performed well showed confidence in applying algebraic, statistical, and financial concepts without excessive reliance on trial-and-error methods.
- Proficiency in data interpretation – Strong responses effectively analysed bivariate data, time series trends, and network problems, demonstrating logical conclusions based on provided datasets.
- Appropriate use of technology – While students could use scientific calculators, the best responses showed discerning application, ensuring accuracy while avoiding dependency on computational tools.
- Logical organisation and presentation – High-scoring responses were well-structured, with clear step-by-step working, appropriate labelling of graphs and tables, and concise final statements that addressed the question requirements.
Advice to Students
The report emphasises that effective exam preparation goes beyond memorising formulas—it requires conceptual understanding, application skills, and precise execution. Key recommendations include:
- Practise multi-step problems – Many students struggled with complex, unfamiliar problems that required integration of multiple mathematical concepts. Regular practice with past papers and scenario-based questions can build confidence in tackling these questions.
- Check answers for reasonableness – A common issue was students failing to evaluate whether their solutions made sense. Using estimation skills and checking results against real-world expectations can prevent careless mistakes.
- Use appropriate notation and units – Students lost marks due to missing units in financial and measurement-based questions. Always include units where necessary and ensure calculations are appropriately labelled.
- Interpret, don’t just calculate – The exam often required written explanations alongside calculations. Successful candidates interpreted their results in context rather than just computing numerical answers.
- Time management matters – Many students left questions unanswered due to time constraints. Practising under timed conditions can help ensure completion of all sections.
💡Check out this comprehensive guide that explores the new QCE system and its impact on high school education in Australia.
Common Mistakes in the 2024 Exam
Several recurring errors were noted across different questions, impacting student performance:
- Misinterpreting the question requirements – Some students misunderstood key terms in financial mathematics and statistical analysis, leading to incorrect application of formulas.
- Incorrect rounding and significant figures – Rounding errors were common, particularly in currency calculations and statistical measures, leading to small but costly mistakes.
- Graphing errors – A number of students did not correctly label axes, scales, or data points in graph-based questions, affecting clarity and accuracy.
- Weak algebraic manipulation – Mistakes in solving simultaneous equations, sequences, and decay models were frequently noted.
- Errors in network and decision mathematics – Some students incorrectly identified the shortest path, critical path, or minimum spanning tree, showing a lack of strategy in network problems.
- Failure to justify responses – Students often arrived at the correct answer but did not provide adequate explanation, resulting in partial marks.
Question-Specific Feedback
The report also provided question-specific observations on student performance:
- Bivariate Data Analysis: Many students struggled with interpreting correlation coefficients and justifying the suitability of regression models. Stronger responses clearly linked statistical findings to real-world contexts.
- Time Series Analysis: Some students failed to apply appropriate smoothing techniques or misinterpreted seasonal trends, leading to incorrect forecasts.
- Financial Mathematics: Loan and annuity questions were frequently mishandled due to incorrect use of financial formulas, particularly when distinguishing between simple and compound interest.
- Earth Geometry and Time Zones: Several students made calculation errors when converting between time zones and longitude differences, affecting accuracy in navigation-based problems.
- Networks and Decision Mathematics: Common mistakes included misidentifying minimum spanning trees and incorrect application of Dijkstra’s algorithm for shortest paths.
Final Thoughts
The 2024 General Mathematics examination report reinforces the importance of understanding mathematical principles rather than just memorising formulas. By improving problem-solving strategies, ensuring precision in responses, and managing time effectively, students can enhance their performance in future assessments. Regular practice, critical evaluation of answers, and clear mathematical communication are key to success.
