The 2024 QCE Economics cohort demonstrated strong subject retention, with a total of 3,913 students completing Unit 1. This number slightly declined to 3,844 students in Unit 2, reflecting a minor dropout rate as students progressed through the syllabus. By the time students reached Units 3 and 4, 3,618 students completed the full course, indicating that the majority who began the subject continued through to the final assessments. This retention rate suggests that students generally remained engaged with the subject throughout their senior years, despite the increasing complexity of economic concepts and assessments in later units.
Understanding the QCE Economics Exam: Format, Expectations, and Key Focus Areas
The QCE Economics examination is designed to assess students' understanding of economic concepts, their ability to analyse economic issues, and their capacity to evaluate economic outcomes using real-world data. The exam structure aligns with the Economics General Senior Syllabus (2019), ensuring a comprehensive assessment of students' knowledge and skills.
Students complete a summative external assessment (EA), which contributes 25% to their final subject result. This combination response exam requires students to demonstrate comprehension of economic principles, interpret data, apply analytical processes, and effectively communicate their findings. The exam includes multiple-choice questions, short-response items, and extended-response tasks, allowing students to showcase their depth of understanding and critical thinking skills. The external assessment is complemented by three internal assessments (IA1, IA2, IA3), which together account for the remaining 75% of the final grade.
This rigorous assessment structure ensures that students engage with both theoretical and applied economics, preparing them for further study or careers in the field.
Insights from multiple choice questions in the 2024 Economics exam
The easiest question in the external assessment was Question 5, with 83.49% of students selecting the correct response. Conversely, the hardest question was Question 2, where only 3.17% of students answered correctly. This suggests that Question 5 was well understood by the majority of students, whereas Question 2 posed significant challenges, potentially due to the complexity of the concept being tested or common misconceptions among students.
Key Takeaways from the 2024 QCE Economics Examination Report
The 2024 QCE Economics Examination Report provides valuable insights into student performance, highlighting key skills that strong responses demonstrated, common pitfalls, and essential areas for improvement. Below is a breakdown of what made high-scoring responses stand out, key advice for future students, and common mistakes observed in the 2024 cohort.
What Do Strong Responses Look Like in QCE Economics?
Students who achieved high marks in the external examination consistently demonstrated the following skills:
- Precise economic terminology – High-achieving students accurately used economic language, ensuring their responses aligned with the syllabus objectives.
- Clear and structured responses – Top responses followed logical structures, particularly in extended responses, where students used introduction-body-conclusion formats to effectively convey arguments.
- Accurate application of economic models and data interpretation – Successful students incorporated graphs, diagrams, and real-world examples to support their analysis. Their explanations were detailed, rather than descriptive, and they explicitly linked theory to the question context.
- Sophisticated evaluation – Instead of merely stating advantages and disadvantages, high-level responses provided critical reasoning and considered multiple perspectives, including short-term vs long-term impacts and the implications of government interventions.
- Numerical accuracy in calculations – Students who performed well in quantitative sections demonstrated accuracy in interpreting percentage changes, elasticity calculations, and GDP data.
Advice for Future QCE Economics Students
The QCAA Examination Report outlined key advice for students preparing for future assessments:
- Develop a strong foundation in economic models and theories – Ensure you fully understand concepts like the circular flow of income, demand and supply, elasticity, macroeconomic objectives, and trade policies.
- Improve data analysis skills – Be comfortable interpreting tables, graphs, and statistics. Practise identifying trends, relationships, and anomalies in economic data.
- Structure extended responses effectively – Examiners noted that students who provided well-organised responses (with clear paragraphs and topic sentences) performed better than those who presented unstructured answers.
- Use precise economic reasoning – When evaluating policies or economic outcomes, go beyond listing pros and cons. Instead, discuss trade-offs, opportunity costs, and unintended consequences.
- Master key mathematical concepts – Be able to calculate percentage changes, elasticity values, and equilibrium adjustments, as these are frequently assessed.
- Stay updated on current economic events – Real-world examples strengthen responses. Try to integrate contemporary case studies, such as inflation trends, trade agreements, and government interventions.
💡Check out this comprehensive guide that explores the new QCE system and its impact on high school education in Australia.
Common Mistakes in the 2024 QCE Economics Exam
Despite strong performances in some areas, several common mistakes were observed:
- Misinterpretation of Key Terms and Economic Models
- Some students confused macroeconomic objectives, particularly the distinctions between economic growth, inflation control, and full employment.
- Supply and demand curves were not always labelled correctly, with errors in shifting curves based on external shocks.
- Weak Data Analysis and Calculation Errors
- Many students miscalculated percentage changes and elasticity values, leading to incorrect conclusions.
- In interpreting graphs, some students failed to link trends to economic theories, instead describing data without analysis.
- Lack of Depth in Evaluation
- Some responses only listed advantages and disadvantages without critically assessing effectiveness, limitations, or broader economic impacts.
- Poor responses lacked comparisons between different economic policies, reducing the depth of evaluation.
- Poor Time Management in the Exam
- Several students rushed short-answer questions and left insufficient time for extended responses, leading to incomplete or underdeveloped arguments.
- Overwriting in lower-mark questions resulted in less time for higher-mark responses, affecting overall scores.
- Misalignment Between Answers and Question Requirements
- Some students failed to apply real-world examples, despite questions asking for application to contemporary issues.
- Overgeneralised responses lacked specificity, reducing their effectiveness in meeting the marking criteria.
Insights from Individual Questions
- Multiple-choice questions: The most challenging questions involved exchange rates and trade relationships, suggesting a weaker understanding of global economic interactions.
- Short-answer responses: Many students did not provide precise definitions of key terms, leading to lost marks. Examiners also noted issues with misinterpreting stimulus material.
- Extended responses: The strongest responses demonstrated clear economic reasoning, effective use of diagrams, and well-structured evaluations. Some students, however, failed to integrate quantitative data effectively or provided one-sided arguments instead of balanced evaluations.
Final Thoughts
The 2024 QCE Economics Examination Report highlights the importance of conceptual clarity, structured writing, and strong analytical skills. To excel, students should practise applying economic theories to real-world scenarios, refine their evaluation techniques, and strengthen their data interpretation skills. By addressing common mistakes and following examiner advice, future candidates can improve their performance and achieve higher results.
