.webp)
The 2024 HSC Biology exam was designed to assess students’ understanding of key syllabus concepts, ranging from cellular biology to genetics, disease mechanisms, and ecological interactions. The exam required students to apply their knowledge, interpret data, and demonstrate scientific reasoning, aligning with the Working Scientifically skills emphasised in the syllabus.
A combination of multiple-choice, short-answer, and extended-response questions tested students’ grasp of heredity, genetic change, infectious and non-infectious diseases, and ecosystem dynamics.
Exam Summary
The 2024 exam was structured into two sections:
- Section I: Multiple-Choice (20 marks) – Covered a wide range of syllabus topics, testing recall, data analysis, and application of biological concepts.
- Section II: Short and Extended Responses (80 marks) – Included a mix of structured responses, data interpretation, and experimental design questions requiring detailed explanations and application of concepts to real-world scenarios.
The exam closely followed the Biology Stage 6 Syllabus, particularly the Year 12 modules:
- Module 5: Heredity – Examined genetic inheritance, mutations, and gene expression.
- Module 6: Genetic Change – Covered biotechnology, genetic technologies, and evolutionary processes.
- Module 7: Infectious Disease – Assessed pathogens, disease transmission, and immune responses.
- Module 8: Non-infectious Disease and Disorders – Focused on epidemiology, environmental health factors, and treatment methods.
The Working Scientifically skills, such as planning and conducting investigations, processing and analysing data, and drawing evidence-based conclusions, were embedded throughout the exam.
Easiest Question: Question 21
(Identifying flower structures and comparing sexual vs asexual reproduction)
This was one of the most accessible questions, as it tested basic biological knowledge from Module 5 (Heredity). Students were required to identify where pollen and ovules are located in a flower and compare sexual vs asexual reproduction. The question was straightforward, and high-scoring responses simply needed to:
- Correctly name the anther (pollen) and ovary (ovules).
- Provide a clear comparison of sexual and asexual reproduction, using a specific organism example (e.g., "yeast" instead of "fungi").
The majority of students scored well on this question, with errors mainly occurring due to incorrect labelling of flower parts or choosing too broad an example.
Hardest Question: Question 32
(Immune response to Helicobacter pylori: Linking innate and adaptive immunity)
This extended-response question required students to explain the body's immune response to Helicobacter pylori, integrating both the innate and adaptive immune system. Many students found this challenging because it required:
- A clear understanding of both immune system components.
- A structured, logical response, explaining how the innate immune system first responds, followed by the activation of the adaptive immune response.
- Scientific terminology, such as macrophages, T cells, B cells, and antibodies.
Weaker responses only mentioned one part of the immune system or failed to link innate and adaptive immunity together. This question required a strong conceptual understanding beyond simple recall, making it one of the most difficult of the exam.
💡Understand how HSC scaling works and discover which subjects get scaled the most and the least.
HSC Biology Examiner Report Analysis: Key Takeaways for 2024 Students
The 2024 HSC Biology Examiner Report provides valuable insights into student performance, highlighting what makes a strong response and where students often go wrong. The feedback emphasises the importance of scientific literacy, data interpretation, and clear, logical explanations. Students who excelled demonstrated a thorough understanding of biological concepts and effectively applied them to different contexts.
The report also reinforces the need for precision in responses, ensuring that students engage with stimulus material, use correct scientific terminology, and apply knowledge accurately. Below is a breakdown of the key skills to focus on, the examiner’s advice, and the most common mistakes made in the 2024 exam.
Key Skills for Success in HSC Biology
Students who performed well in the exam displayed the following key skills:
- Understanding and Applying Scientific Concepts – High-scoring responses did more than define terms; they explained processes in a structured, logical manner and made clear connections between concepts.
- Effective Use of Scientific Terminology – The best responses used accurate and specific biological terms rather than vague or general descriptions.
- Data Interpretation and Analysis – Strong answers not only identified trends in graphs and tables but also explained reasons behind these trends using biological principles.
- Logical and Structured Responses – The top-scoring students planned their responses to ensure information was sequential, relevant, and concise rather than disorganised or overly lengthy.
- Engaging with Stimulus Material – Many questions included diagrams, graphs, or scenarios, and the strongest responses directly referenced the stimulus rather than providing generic answers.
- Accuracy in Calculations and Working – For numerical questions, correct units and clear working were essential. Strong responses included step-by-step working to demonstrate understanding.
💡Discover valuable insights into how ATARs are calculated and how subject scaling affects their final rank here!
Examiner Advice to Students
The general feedback from the report encourages students to:
- Read the question carefully – Many students lost marks by misinterpreting key words or failing to address all parts of the question.
- Understand command terms – Words like ‘explain,’ ‘compare,’ and ‘evaluate’ have distinct meanings, and students need to tailor their responses accordingly.
- Plan responses before writing – Structured responses were more concise and logical, avoiding repetition or irrelevant information.
- Use correct biological terms – Avoid general words like "thing" or "stuff" when referring to biological processes.
- Show all calculations and include units – A clear step-by-step approach helps avoid unnecessary errors and ensures partial marks for working.
Breakdown of Question-Specific Advice
- Question 21 (Flower structures and reproduction) – Good responses correctly identified structures like the anther and ovary and compared sexual vs asexual reproduction using specific examples (e.g., yeast instead of "fungi"). Common mistake: Confusing flower parts or using incorrect examples.
- Question 22 (Microbe experiment safety & reliability) – Strong responses justified safety precautions in detail (e.g., "to prevent direct transmission of microbes" instead of just "to prevent infection"). Common mistake: Confusing reliability, validity, and accuracy.
- Question 23 (Electromagnetic radiation & mutations) – The best answers linked the type of radiation (e.g., UV light) to its effect on DNA structure. Common mistake: Confusing germline and somatic mutations.
- Question 24 (Non-infectious disease and education campaigns) – High-scoring responses linked the features of a campaign to its impact on public behaviour. Common mistake: Listing campaign features without explaining how they reduce disease incidence.
- Question 25 (Cloning and genetic inheritance) – Better responses described all steps of somatic cell nuclear transfer. Common mistake: Giving a general description of cloning without mentioning key steps like electric stimulation for cell division.
- Question 26 (Plant disease and agriculture) – Top responses named a specific disease (e.g., Panama disease in bananas) and linked it to its effect on yield. Common mistake: Vague descriptions like "disease affects plants."
- Question 27 (Pasteurisation and disease outbreaks) – Strong responses used specific data points from the graph to explain the impact of pasteurisation. Common mistake: Failing to reference the graph or explain trends fully.
- Question 28 (Genetics and probability) – Good answers correctly completed a Punnett square and probability calculations. Common mistake: Contradictory probability values (e.g., writing 1/4 and 33%).
- Question 29 (Graphing Type 2 diabetes data) – The best responses plotted accurate points, drew a line of best fit, and extrapolated trends correctly. Common mistake: Poor graph scaling and incorrect use of best-fit lines.
- Question 30 (Polypeptide synthesis: mRNA & tRNA) – High-scoring answers clearly explained the roles of mRNA and tRNA in relation to polypeptide synthesis. Common mistake: Confusing transcription and replication.
- Question 31 (Torpor and body temperature regulation) – Better responses used specific data from the graph to justify their answer. Common mistake: Misinterpreting the x-axis scale.
- Question 32 (Immune response to Helicobacter pylori) – Strong responses explained both innate and adaptive immunity in a logical sequence. Common mistake: Failing to connect innate and adaptive responses.
💡Check out why past papers are the best way to study for exams!
Common Mistakes in the 2024 Exam
The most frequent errors observed across the paper were:
- Misinterpreting questions – Many students overlooked key details or failed to address all parts of the question.
- Confusing scientific terms – Examples included mixing up reliability and validity, asexual vs sexual reproduction, or germline vs somatic mutations.
- Failure to use data in explanations – In graph-based questions, weaker responses only described trends without explaining why the trend occurred.
- Inconsistent probability calculations – Some students contradicted themselves by listing different probability formats (e.g., "1/4 and 33%").
- General or vague responses – Answers needed more precise scientific language rather than broad statements.
- Lack of clear structure in long responses – Some extended responses jumped between ideas without logical sequencing, making them difficult to follow.
- Not engaging with stimulus material – Many students ignored diagrams, graphs, or tables, leading to lost marks.
- Errors in graphing – Issues included incorrect scaling, missing best-fit lines, and poor extrapolation.
- Skipping working in calculations – Even if the final answer was correct, some students lost marks by not showing their steps.
Final Thoughts
The 2024 HSC Biology Examiner Report makes it clear that success in the exam is not just about memorising facts—it’s about applying knowledge logically and precisely. High-achieving students demonstrated clear explanations, strong data interpretation, and a structured approach to extended responses. Avoiding common pitfalls, such as misreading questions and using vague language, can help students maximise their marks.
For future HSC Biology students, focusing on scientific literacy, structured responses, and engagement with stimulus material will be key to excelling in the exam.
